| Both Communist and UN forces fought              the Korean War largely with surplus World War II              weapons. A sometimes unappreciated fact is              that, at the start of the Korean War, the US              actually had no new conventional weapons due to a              complete cessation of procurement for ground              warfare following WWII. Harry Truman had been              convinced that nuclear weapons meant the last major              ground wars had been fought. Truman's              Secretaries of Defense, James Forrestal and Louis              Johnson, not only forced a change in Army training              methods, shaping it to produce Garrison              peace-keeping troops, but virtually stopped the              development of new infantry arms and              communications. The Marine Corps was reduced to a              poorly equipped skeleton of its supposed strength,              a total of about six fighting battalions. Two              Marine Divisions from WWII would have crushed the              entire North Korean Army, but Truman hadn't              left the United States even one. 5th Marines, (LtCol Ray Murray), were              the troops carrying the colors of the entire First              Marine Division in July of '50. Six rifle              companies of about 7 officers and 255 men each,              equipped with worn out WWII weapons. They              didn't get the third companies in their rifle              battalions, the elements of maneuver!, until              after the 1st Battle of the Naktong, 17-18 August              of '50. Until the Marine Battalions had their              third company to outflank the enemy while the two              attacking companies held them in combat, they              suffered many unnecessary casualties in the              desperate fighting. The Communist bloc, fighting              through its secondary powers, were armed with newer              weapons than the American and ROKs in 1950, but              they were also obsolescent. For example although              the "burp              gun" was very effective in the close              infantry assaults of the Korean War the AK-47,              already a Soviet standard in 1949, would have been              far superior. Although newer series of infantry              weapons, radios, and vehicles had either been              developed or were in production on both sides, they              were all largely withheld, along with nuclear              weapons. From the infantry point of view, the KW              was an anachronism. Ready or not Truman sent our              civilians in uniform, inadequately prepared and              with obsolescent weapons, into one of the most              vicious infantry wars our nation has fought since              the slaughter and devastation of our own Civil              War. Bert Kortegaard,              2/19/2012
 |